Search

Chris Thoman

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
92 matches · 50W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
3%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.80. Lower than today’s 3.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
36 of 266
OR · 4.0
72 of 498

Chris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams33 teams · 2015–2026
IRV-Strange
2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2026
MAC-Kafi/Post
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2026
MAC-Hill
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2026
PTC-Ogden/Leedy
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2025
IRV-Strange
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2025
MAC-Armstrong/Thoman
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chris has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chris has gone from the 96th to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
57.9%
33W–24L · 54.4% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.6% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history92 matches
L
Michelle Beilstein / Hector M Salomonmixed
2026-05-16 · IRV-Strange · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christy Strange
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Klinger
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · IRV-Strange · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Libby North
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-05 · IRV-Strange · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Lyon
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Oh
0.021below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-30 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Hall
+0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Matt Snyder / Anthony Valenzuela
2026-01-24 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hergenhan
0.009about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-06 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Jones
0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-11-22 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Jones
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-14 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Eckelman
0.058below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-11-01 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Eckelman
+0.018better than expected — took 68% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-10-31 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Jones
0.013below expectation — took 42% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.