Search

James Fenner

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
30 matches · 11W–19L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
2%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
43 of 266
OR · 4.0
83 of 498

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been a steady 4.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.8% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 61.4% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 29.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history30 matches
W
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Lux
+0.023better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark King
0.010about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Damon Ogden
0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Jonathan Quon / Paul Blomberg
2025-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Damon Ogden
+0.058better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark King
+0.009better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Damon Ogden
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Jeff Fontaine / Robert Wylychamps
2024-11-09 · #2 Doubles · with Ron Selis
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-3
L
Francisco Diaz / Carlos Moraleschamps
2024-11-08 · #2 Doubles · with Ron Selis
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-06-22 · #1 Doubles · with Ron Selis
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Phillip Koester / Paul Shmotolokhachamps
2024-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with John Popplewell
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-11-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Jay
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Malcolm Baker / Michael Lavios
2023-10-29 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Selis
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.