← Search

Tom Lux

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 76W–45L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tom Lux to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
2026-09-12 · IRV-Lux · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-30 · Broken String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damon Ogden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Broken String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · Broken String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damon Ogden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · Broken String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · PTC-Ogden/Lux · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Friedrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · PTC-Ogden/Lux · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siamak Hajarizadeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-24 · PTC-Ogden/Lux · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Friedrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · PTC-Ogden/Lux · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Quisling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-26 · PTC-Ogden/Lux · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Friedrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-12-06 · IRV-Lux · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Fenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-11-21 · IRV-Lux · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2009–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
71.7%
33W–13L · 59.2% of games
4.5
32%
8W–17L · 43.1% of games
8.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 69.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
23 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert