← Search

Dave Cobban

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 52W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dave Cobban to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Peterson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-07 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · WHRC-Moreno · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Wilcox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · WHRC-Pham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Brundage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-04-19 · WHRC-Moreno · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Harrison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-03 · WHRC-Pham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-14 · WHRC-Pham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-06 · WHRC-Pham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Khozein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-30 · WHRC-Pham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2013–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
63.5%
33W–19L · 55.1% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 42% of games
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 63.4% of games
8.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer