WHRC-Pham

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89

David Pham

usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.86

Dave Cobban

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.81

Henry Vu

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.80

Scott Holland

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.78

Jianxun Zhang

usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4

3.77

TRIET NGUYEN

usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4

3.77

Martin Schnappenberger

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.76

Blair Thompson

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.63

Adam Brundage

usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.48

Ryan Patterson

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.25

Todd Khozein

usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.17

Kevin Heller

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

David Pham

147W–107L career

0%96%4%

3.89

Dave Cobban

52W–33L career

0%97%3%

3.86

Henry Vu

49W–44L career

0%99%1%

3.81

Scott Holland

36W–30L career

0%98%1%

3.80

Jianxun Zhang

59W–43L career

1%99%1%

3.78

TRIET NGUYEN

89W–37L career

0%99%0%

3.77

Martin Schnappenberger

41W–18L career

1%98%1%

3.77

Blair Thompson

16W–11L career

4%93%3%

3.76

Adam Brundage

35W–36L career

11%89%0%

3.63

3.5

Ryan Patterson

11W–16L career

0%82%18%

3.48

3.5

Todd Khozein

52W–59L career

1%99%0%

3.25

3.5

Kevin Heller

25W–24L career

7%93%0%

3.17

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.