Search

Michael Genovese

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
44 matches · 29W–15L · seasons 20212026
Where Michael sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Michael is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
MAC-Kafi/Post
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2026
LOTC-Lee/Hasle
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
LOTC-Lee/Hasle
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
Cronn/Crate
2025 One Doubles · 4.0 Men
2025
N OR-MAC-Kafi
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2024
MAC-Johnson
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Michael has gone from the 35th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 67.6% of games
4.0
40%
8W–12L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-03-14 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Post
0.036below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-01 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Lenker
+0.026better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-06-12 · Cronn/Crate · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
+0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Lee
0.041below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Hasle
0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-05-03 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Hasle
+0.020better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-02-15 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Larocca
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-01-19 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Vanderhoff
0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-01-03 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Vanderhoff
+0.032better than expected — took 60% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-06-10 · MAC-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
+0.016better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Tony Moreno / Shaun Anderson
2024-06-08 · MAC-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Jones
0.024below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-06-01 · MAC-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.