Search

Roger Mickey

Gresham, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
31 matches · 9W–22L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.51
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
43%
stay 3.5
57%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 81% stay · 19% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.43. Lower than today’s 3.51 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gresham · 3.5
1 of 9
OR · 3.5
56 of 735

Roger is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams14 teams · 2001–2026
CAC-Morales
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2026
CAC-Lewis
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2026
CAC-Morales
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
CAC-Morales
2024 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
CAC-Morales
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
N OR-CAC-Morales
2023 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 20.8% of games
8.0
30%
6W–14L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-06-14 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vincent Robertson
0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Stefan Lee / Kyle Altenbern
2026-05-24 · CAC-Lewis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal Burgstahler
0.069below expectation — took 8% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Brad Johnson / Dan Valencia
2026-05-23 · CAC-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Tracy
0.030below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-15 · CAC-Morales · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Len Morales
+0.014about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · CAC-Morales · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Yang
+0.026better than expected — took 62% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Van Khieu / Wenyan Li
2026-04-26 · CAC-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Yang
+0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Hang Gao
2026-04-18 · CAC-Lewis · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.077below expectation — took 14% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-26 · CAC-Morales · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Eliason
0.069below expectation — took 25% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-05-15 · CAC-Morales · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Len Morales
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-1
L
Richard Keller Ii / John Williams
2025-05-08 · CAC-Morales · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Yang
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-04-17 · CAC-Morales · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Olson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-03-21 · CAC-Morales · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Khamsouk
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.