← Search

James Horen

LAKE OSWEGO, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 103W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Horen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Elisa Geller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · WHRC-Mehlhorn · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Randolph Splitter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · NOR-THPRD-Pham · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elisa Geller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · NOR-THPRD-Pham · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Claire Thayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · WHRC-Mehlhorn · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Thomas Mehlhorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-31 · WHRC-Lipke · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Toni Lipke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-12 · WHRC-Lipke · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Toni Lipke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-03 · WHRC-Lipke · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Toni Lipke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with Scott Dickinson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Dickinson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Scott Dickinson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-25 · WHRC-Mehlhorn · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with David Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams114 teams · 2003–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 66.5% of games
4.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 53% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 55.1% of games
8.0
56.9%
29W–22L · 51.8% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 42.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 53.1% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert