WHRC-Mo

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.59 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66

Martin McClanan

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.65

Alan Lave

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.56

James Horen

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.54

Stanley Mo

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5

3.44

Matt Thayer

usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5

3.34

Michael Rollyson

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.33

Greg van Gasse

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.25

Tony Humpage

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.15

Simon Lofts

published 3.5

3.14

David Ritchie

usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

2.94

Mark Becker

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Martin McClanan

5W–11L career

14%85%1%

3.66

Alan Lave

19W–22L career

8%92%0%

3.65

James Horen

99W–69L career

16%84%0%

3.56

3.5

Stanley Mo

37W–84L career

0%73%27%

3.54

3.5

Matt Thayer

91W–63L career

0%92%8%

3.44

3.5

Michael Rollyson

4W–8L career

4%86%11%

3.34

3.5

Greg van Gasse

8W–22L career

1%94%5%

3.33

3.5

Tony Humpage

99W–73L career

1%99%0%

3.25

3.5

Simon Lofts

35W–51L career

13%86%1%

3.15

3.5

David Ritchie

11W–26L career

9%91%0%

3.14

Mark Becker

15W–33L career · type A

0%87%13%

2.94

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.