WHRC-Becker/Melhorn

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56

James Horen

usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4

3.54

Stanley Mo

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.44

Matt Thayer

usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5

—

Andrew Kitchen

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.25

Tony Humpage

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.06

Mitchell Todd

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.94

Mark Becker

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.90

Thomas Mehlhorn

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3

2.77

Randolph Splitter

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.70

William Pettis

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

James Horen

99W–69L career

16%84%0%

3.56

3.5

Stanley Mo

37W–84L career

0%73%27%

3.54

3.5

Matt Thayer

91W–63L career

0%92%8%

3.44

3.5

Andrew Kitchen

14W–19L career

not enough data

—

3.5

Tony Humpage

99W–73L career

1%99%0%

3.25

Mitchell Todd

42W–39L career

0%65%35%

3.06

Mark Becker

15W–33L career · type A

0%87%13%

2.94

Thomas Mehlhorn

14W–15L career

0%92%8%

2.90

Randolph Splitter

7W–30L career

7%87%6%

2.77

William Pettis

14W–17L career

6%93%1%

2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.