Search

David Shook

VANCOUVER, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
69 matches · 34W–35L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
86%
stay 3.0
14%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.91 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
VANCOUVER · 3.0
5 of 8
WA · 3.0
406 of 755

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams45 teams · 2008–2026
VTC-Shook/Darling
2026 Adult 70 & Over · 70 & Over Men
2026
N OR-VTC-Archedon
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2026
NOR-VTC-Archedon
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2026
N OR-VTC-Archedon
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
VTC-Shook/Darling
2025 Adult 70 & Over · 70 & Over Men
2025
VTC-Shook
2024 Adult 70 & Over · Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.52019202020212023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, David has gone from the 51st to the 46th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.7% of games
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 38.6% of games
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 61.7% of games
7.0
50%
10W–10L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
W
Steve Honodel / Francisco Hevia
2026-07-17 · VTC-Shook/Darling · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ken Embree
0.042below expectation — took 68% of games against 77% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · N OR-VTC-Archedon · #1 Doubles · with Frank Brown
+0.027better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · N OR-VTC-Archedon · #1 Doubles · with Frank Brown
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jeremy Geschwind / Paul Parkinson
2026-06-17 · VTC-Shook/Darling · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Arthur Roper
+0.006about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · N OR-VTC-Archedon · #1 Doubles · with Lee Wiegand
+0.004about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Wiegand
+0.043better than expected — took 58% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Wiegand
+0.040better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-17 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Wiegand
+0.050better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Sunshine
0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Harold Kraver / Vince Hugheschamps
2026-01-31 · N OR-VTC-Archedon · #3 Doubles · with Tim Janes
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Audie Nichols / Bill Bondchamps
2026-01-30 · N OR-VTC-Archedon · #3 Doubles · with Tim Janes
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-3
W
Thomas Weik / Steve Berkleychamps
2026-01-30 · N OR-VTC-Archedon · #2 Doubles · with Jon Mandeville
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.