Teams

N OR-VTC-Archedon

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.05 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Evan Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Robert Piercy
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.25
Tim Janes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.22
Frank Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.10
Mister Archedon
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.05
Lee Wiegand
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.91
David Shook
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Steven Darling
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.78
Charles Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Robert Hillison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.43
Wesley Eader
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Evan Cohn
144W–73L career
0%73%27%
3.54
3.5
Robert Piercy
88W–79L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3
Tim Janes
47W–53L career
0%14%86%
3.25
3
Frank Brown
114W–69L career
0%17%83%
3.22
3.5
Mister Archedon
108W–47L career
10%90%0%
3.10
3
Lee Wiegand
62W–61L career · type A
0%69%31%
3.05
3
David Shook
34W–35L career
0%92%8%
2.91
3
Steven Darling
62W–86L career
0%99%1%
2.80
3
Charles Stewart
37W–61L career
6%87%7%
2.78
2.5
Robert Hillison
18W–8L career · type A
0%54%46%
2.43
2.5
Wesley Eader
55W–103L career · type A
0%57%43%
2.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.