Search

Francisco Hevia

Gresham, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
23 matches · 5W–18L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.51
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
44%
stay 2.5
56%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 82% stay · 18% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.43. Lower than today’s 2.51 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 2.5
31 of 61

Francisco is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
CAC-Hevia/Eastwood
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2026
CAC-Hevia
2026 Adult 70 & Over · 70 & Over Men
2026
CAC-Snyder/Delplato
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
CAC-VanLeuven
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
N OR-CAC-Snyder
2024 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–5L · 38.4% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-07-23 · CAC-Hevia · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Takeshi Nanbu
+0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
David Shook / Ken Embree
2026-07-17 · CAC-Hevia · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Steve Honodel
+0.042better than expected — took 32% of games against 23% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
James Carey / Richard Clark
2026-06-26 · CAC-Hevia · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Takeshi Nanbu
+0.075better than expected — took 43% of games against 18% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-18 · CAC-Hevia · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Steve Snyder
+0.045better than expected — took 48% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Greg Luevano / Steve Thunstedt
2026-06-02 · CAC-Hevia · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Victor Regner
+0.074better than expected — took 37% of games against 14% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-20 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #1 Doubles · with Douglas Walker
0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-14 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglas Walker
0.035below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-01 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doug Orr
+0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doug Orr
+0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglas Walker
+0.006about as expected — took 60% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-26 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Allen VanLeuven
+0.010about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-20 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ed Kluss
+0.085better than expected — took 67% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.