Search

Amy Bucher

West Linn, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
256 matches · 178W–78L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.05
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
27%
down to 4.0
73%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 16% down · 84% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.08. Higher than today’s 4.05 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
West Linn · 4.5
9 of 12
OR · 4.5
135 of 226

Amy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams55 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amy has played at 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

3.03.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Amy has gone from the 71st to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
92%
23W–2L · 71.7% of games
4.0
75%
27W–9L · 61.8% of games
4.5
50%
13W–13L · 50.3% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
71.8%
28W–11L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
75.6%
31W–10L · 61.9% of games
9.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history256 matches
W
2026-07-26 · CRRC-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Hobi
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Kai Zhang / Ren Toshié Miuramixed
2026-07-24 · CRRC-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Hobi
+0.000below expectation — took 59% of games against 70% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · CRRC-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Koch
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Green-Zwemke
0.014about as expected — took 63% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassia Carpio
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 4-3
W
2026-03-13 · LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Green-Zwemke
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Stacey Merrick / Cindy Nordlund
2026-01-17 · LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassia Carpio
+0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-09 · LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassia Carpio
+0.037better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-04 · LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassia Carpio
+0.031better than expected — took 55% of games against 42% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/Amixed
2025-11-29 · CRRC-Johnson/Newcomb · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Johnson
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Andrew Walczyk / Emilee Plankmixed
2025-11-15 · CRRC-Johnson/Newcomb · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandon Shell
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-09-28 · CRRC-Johnson/Newcomb · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Johnson
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.