← Search

David Pham

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
260 matches · 149W–111L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Pham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history260 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Heidi Wilcox championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jaime Venezia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michelle Aman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · NOR-THPRD-Pham · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Wilcox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emily Hagelgans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Nordstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jaime Venezia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Laurie Horenstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-05 · NOR-THPRD-Pham · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Wilcox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Nordstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-29 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vincent Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · WHRC-De La Cruz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirt Eftekhar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams123 teams · 2005–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
57.1%
40W–30L · 53.3% of games
4.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
61.4%
27W–17L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
77.4%
48W–14L · 58.4% of games
9.0mixed
6.7%
1W–14L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
144 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
38 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer