Search

David Pham

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
254 matches · 147W–107L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.89
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
91%
stay 4.0
9%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.84. Lower than today’s 3.89 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
18 of 266
OR · 4.0
38 of 498

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams118 teams · 2005–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, David has gone from the 43rd to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
57.1%
40W–30L · 53.3% of games
4.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
62.8%
27W–16L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
77%
47W–14L · 58.2% of games
9.0mixed
7.7%
1W–12L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history254 matches
W
2026-07-17 · THPRD-Horenstein/Pham · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jaime Venezia
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Noreen Kaye / Garrett Kayechamps
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Laurie Horenstein
0.005below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · THPRD-Pham · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Wilcox
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Van Hong Nguyen / Van Khieumixed
2026-06-13 · THPRD-Horenstein/Pham · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Nordstrom
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-29 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vincent Lee
0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · WHRC-De La Cruz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirt Eftekhar
0.012about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vincent Lee
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Ken Schwerd / Owen Prendergast
2026-05-10 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-01 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Schnappenberger
0.012about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Ariel Gomez / Aidan Lee
2026-04-12 · WHRC-De La Cruz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
+0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · with Martin Schnappenberger
0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Hector M Salomon / Shane Adam Young
2026-04-03 · WHRC-Pham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blair Thompson
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.