Search

Michelle Aman

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
50 matches · 27W–23L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.42
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
84%
stay 4.5
16%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.36. Lower than today’s 4.42 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
5 of 119
OR · 4.5
7 of 226

Michelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams47 teams · 2003–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michelle has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

4.04.55.02019202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Michelle has gone from the 83rd to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.5% of games
5.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 39% of games
10.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Spear/Leake · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christie Post
0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eric Lee
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Xavier Denis
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Lucy Erickson / Paige Polizois
2026-07-08 · Spear/Leake · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Spear
0.051below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Jennifer Cao / Emily Hagelgans
2026-07-06 · Spear/Leake · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Spear
+0.017better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jimmy Shen
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · Spear/Leake · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christie Post
0.014about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · NOR-THPRD-Ly · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tamara Justus
0.032below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · NOR-THPRD-Ly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Graham
+0.016better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · NOR-THPRD-Ly · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christie Post
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Honghui Liang
0.032below expectation — took 55% of games against 66% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Honghui Liang
0.056below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.