← Search

Rebecca Martinez Griffin

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 96W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Martinez Griffin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
L
2026-08-09 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-12 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeb Hubbs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-05 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeb Hubbs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Tammen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-07 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Naugler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Naugler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Naugler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2008–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.5% of games
4.0
72.7%
32W–12L · 60.8% of games
4.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 59.7% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 53.1% of games
9.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
29 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert