← Search

Amanda Wiley

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 32W–17L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amanda Wiley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-06-12 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Ferrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tara Heikila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-13 · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Evola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-10-26 · N OR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Evola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-24 · N OR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Evola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-09-07 · N OR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Evola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Ferrer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-06-15 · N OR-LOTC-Ferrer · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-04-27 · N OR-LOTC-Ferrer · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Bucher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2025-03-29 · N OR-LOTC-Ferrer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Ferrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-03-08 · LOTC-Ferrer/Berkman 9.0 · #1 Female Doubles · 9.0 · with Avery Liening mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 72.3% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.5% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.3% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
3 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert