← Search

Joshua Bradshaw

Salem, OR
4.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
25 matches · 18W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Joshua Bradshaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Ginny Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Kari Hastings championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Kari Hastings championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Marc Ollivier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-14 · MPRC-Burcham · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liam Burcham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Davis Clem
2026-06-07 · SHC-Goldsmith · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · MPRC-Burcham · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · MPRC-Burcham · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josiah Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · SHC-Goldsmith · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tim Layman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · MPRC-Burcham · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Philip Stephenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-17 · SHC-Goldsmith · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Marc Ollivier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-10 · MPRC-Burcham · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Will Havnaer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.2% of games
5.0
75%
3W–1L · 65.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 66.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#1 Singles
16%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer