← Search

Seth Lee

Happy Valley, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
97 matches · 43W–54L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Seth sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Seth is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Seth has been a steady 5.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

4.55.02019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Seth has gone from the 43rd to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
75%
6W–2L · 65.9% of games
5.0
30.3%
10W–23L · 46.5% of games
10.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.4% of games
9.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history97 matches
W
Barbara Ann Andrews / Charlie Williamschamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Aimee Robinson
+0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Shannon Nelson / LUISA GOMEZchamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Aimee Robinson
−0.038below expectation — took 43% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Aimee Robinson
−0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Ryan Nakajima / Andrew Nakajima
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with James Luu
+0.035better than expected — took 46% of games against 34% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Marc Ollivier / Joshua Bradshaw
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bill Terry
−0.024below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kihiro Karasawa
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 5.0
−0.082below expectation — took 14% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Benjamin Valenti / Ian Paik
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Mark Taylor
+0.020better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Davis Clem
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.092better than expected — took 80% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Elijah Nelson / Andy Stecher
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Enzo Castaldo
−0.016below expectation — took 39% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Carlos Donat / Paul Reber
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bill Terry
−0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Andrew Bryan / Nam Cho
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Richard Shugar
−0.003about as expected — took 39% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Amy Juppenlatz Sweet / Gordon Barrowsmixed
2025-11-30 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Aimee Robinson
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.