Search

Elijah Nelson

Battle Ground, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
129 matches · 98W–31L · seasons 20222026
Where Elijah sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Elijah is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elijah has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

4.04.55.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 9.0, Elijah has gone from the 89th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
4.5
86%
37W–6L · 63.7% of games
5.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.5% of games
9.0
60%
6W–4L · 59.1% of games
9.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history129 matches
W
Ryan Goldsmith / Tim Layman
2026-06-07 · VTC-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Atom Fjeldsted
+0.052better than expected — took 56% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Reif Larsen / Connor Leahy
2026-06-06 · VTC-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Simon Collis
0.018below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Eric Pickard / Sergio Toledo
2026-05-23 · VTC-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Atom Fjeldsted
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Enzo Castaldo / Seth Lee
2026-04-24 · VTC-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andy Stecher
+0.016better than expected — took 61% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Andres E. Lozano / Carlos Sandovalchamps
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · with Atom Fjeldsted
+0.004about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Minar Rane / Farhan Sadiquechamps
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · with Atom Fjeldsted
0.023below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Pranav Sabbu / Nathan Quanchamps
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · with Atom Fjeldsted
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Alan Liao / Michael Frajkorchamps
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · with Atom Fjeldsted
0.016below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Darrin Heinz / Jason Merklechamps
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · with Simon Collis
+0.047better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-02-15 · VTC-Nelson · #1 Male Singles · 9.0
0.086below expectation — took 25% of games against 64% expected
6-2
W
2026-02-01 · VTC-Nelson · #1 Male Doubles · 9.0 · with Micah Nelson
0.017below expectation — took 55% of games against 61% expected
6-5
W
2026-01-18 · VTC-Nelson · #1 Male Doubles · 9.0 · with Keith Anderson
+0.040better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.