← Search

Sage Katayama

PORTLAND, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 63W–24L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Sage Katayama to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-09-13 · WHRC-Reutin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kourtnie Katayama mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Nicole Hopman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Joe Mcroberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Joe Mcroberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Ben Natinsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · PT&E/SJRC-Truong · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Filip Zivkovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · PT&E/SJRC-Truong · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Joe Mcroberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Cheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Mark Taylor / Bill Terry
2026-05-30 · PT&E/SJRC-Truong · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Joe Mcroberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Lake Ihly / Joel Garcia
2026-05-24 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joe Mcroberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joe Mcroberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 64.4% of games
5.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 51.7% of games
10.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#1 Male Doubles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal