Search

Phalkun Mam

Lake Oswego, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
73 matches · 44W–29L · seasons 20212026
Where Phalkun sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Phalkun is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Phalkun has been 5.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Phalkun has gone from the 71st to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.0
60%
15W–10L · 54.9% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.7% of games
9.0mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-07-24 · LCC-Schweitz Late Night Fried Chicken · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Klinger
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · LCC-Schweitz Late Night Fried Chicken · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Simmons
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Carlos Donat / KRISTIAN PEEVchamps
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Shouta Fukamachi
0.009below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Mikolaj Caruk / Jasper Koenen
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Connor Leahy
+0.020better than expected — took 55% of games against 44% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Sage Katayama / Filip Zivkovic
2026-06-13 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Matthaeyus Walker
0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Joe Mcroberts / Ryan Nakajima
2026-06-12 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Matthaeyus Walker
+0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Mikolaj Caruk / Noah Newman
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Marcus Eyth
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Noah Newman / Kihiro Karasawa
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Christopher Evola
0.010below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Mark Taylor / Joe Brooks
2026-05-09 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lew de Leon
+0.006better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Owen Suagee / Richard Sabo
2026-04-19 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dyllan Fitzgerald
0.008about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Christopher Evola / Pannhara Mam
2026-04-04 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Matthaeyus Walker - *
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · with Kelly Mohr
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.