← Search

Andrew Huang

Seattle, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
118 matches · 82W–36L · seasons 2023–2026
Where Andrew sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Andrew is one of 67 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrew has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

4.04.55.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Andrew has gone from the 49th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
4.5
95%
19W–1L · 61% of games
5.0
45.9%
17W–20L · 47.2% of games
10.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.3% of games
9.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history118 matches
L
Miles Lander / Steven Balls
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexander Calpagiu
+0.019about as expected — took 38% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles · 5.0
−0.188about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Wataru Ueno / Ian Clare
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Vineeth Omkaram
+0.026better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Michael Sutanto
+0.031better than expected — took 57% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Nicholas Bishop / Winston Ngo
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alex Namba
+0.056better than expected — took 57% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Noah Inahara
−0.166about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Ben Falk / Scott Hulse
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Luke Sarausad
−0.050below expectation — took 37% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-6
L
Dima Bezborodov / Michael Costello
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Diego Manzanas Lopez
−0.006about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Julian Seneviratne
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 5.0
+0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Piers Foley / Chris Vrabel
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Branden Muraki
−0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Benjamin Elliott
+0.036better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Callan Peterson / Jared Zaugg
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Winston Ngo
+0.063better than expected — took 57% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.