← Search

Stephanie Paulson

Wilsonville, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 119W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Paulson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Christie Post championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joerg Droste mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joerg Droste mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · NOR-WHRC-Ly · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sydnie Binder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Nicole Partch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-05-17 · #1 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Audrey Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-04 · NOR-WHRC-Ly · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Megan Sporndli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Roman Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-12-13 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Andrew Pritchard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-29 · N OR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joe Mcroberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2015–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 66.2% of games
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 74.7% of games
4.5
67.3%
33W–16L · 61% of games
5.0
80%
4W–1L · 53.8% of games
10.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.8% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
35 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer