← Search

Joe Mcroberts

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 52W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joe Mcroberts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Sage Katayama championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Sage Katayama championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Alena Lauritsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Alyssa Mah championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-13 · PT&E/SJRC-Truong · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-12 · PT&E/SJRC-Truong · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ryan Nakajima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · PT&E/SJRC-Truong · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sage Katayama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Natinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Mark Taylor / Bill Terry
2026-05-30 · PT&E/SJRC-Truong · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sage Katayama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sage Katayama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sage Katayama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 66.4% of games
5.0
50%
4W–4L · 52.2% of games
10.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 33.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57% of games
9.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#1 Male Doubles
10%
8 matches
#1 Male Singles
8%
6 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer