← Search

Natalia Devore

Tacoma, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 170W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Natalia Devore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Molly Canada championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Molly Canada championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Cheong championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Cheong championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Cheong championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-09 · SWW-LRC-Davis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Terra Yara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-03 · SWW-Devore · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chanel Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · SWW-LRC-Davis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Molly Canada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · SWW-LRC-Davis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Shinoda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · SWW-LRC-Davis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Candace Hines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · SWW-Devore · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Molly Canada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · SWW-LRC-Davis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sachiko Ishihara-Spray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
76.5%
65W–20L · 59.3% of games
5.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.7% of games
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 62.1% of games
5.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 61.7% of games
9.0mixed
65.9%
27W–14L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
35 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
25 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe