← Search

Reva Wallace

Olympia, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
304 matches · 135W–169L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
100%
down to 4.0
0%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 97% down · 3% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.84. Higher than today’s 3.74 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 4.5
8 of 8
WA · 4.5
363 of 364

Reva is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Reva has been a steady 4.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Reva has gone from the 25th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 62.1% of games
4.5
41.3%
62W–88L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.3% of games
8.0mixed
51.6%
16W–15L · 49.2% of games
9.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history304 matches
L
Kaci Pham / Tessa Tapmongkol
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sachiko Ishihara-Spray
−0.047below expectation — took 33% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alana Llacuna
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charlayne Espinosa
−0.043below expectation — took 57% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 6-5
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charlayne Espinosa
−0.029below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zhi George
+0.011better than expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Simonson
+0.030better than expected — took 40% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charlayne Espinosa
−0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charlayne Espinosa
−0.037below expectation — took 53% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Erin Huffman / Kathleen McNamee
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Byrum
+0.019better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Casale
−0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Simonson
+0.016about as expected — took 38% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Simonson
+0.029better than expected — took 35% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.