Search

Charlayne Espinosa

Tacoma, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
36 matches · 10W–26L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.01
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
43%
down to 4.0
57%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 25% down · 75% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.05. Higher than today’s 4.01 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 4.5
7 of 15
WA · 4.5
250 of 387

Charlayne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Charlayne has been a steady 4.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

4.04.52021202220252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Charlayne has gone from the 42nd to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
28%
7W–18L · 41.5% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.017better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Reva Wallace
0.037below expectation — took 57% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-5
L
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Kohler
0.012below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Terra Yara
0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Terra Yara
+0.009about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Reva Wallace
0.023below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Reva Wallace
0.012below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Reva Wallace
0.027below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Julia Gidovlenko
2026-03-29 · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Emily Hineschamps
2025-08-09 · #1 Singles
+0.019better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Reva Wallace
0.031below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Reva Wallace
+0.029better than expected — took 41% of games against 33% expected
7-6, 3-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.