Search

Mary Green-Zwemke

Sherwood, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
111 matches · 79W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.02
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
40%
down to 4.0
60%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 24% down · 76% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.06. Higher than today’s 4.02 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 4.5
153 of 226

Mary is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mary has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.5 across 4 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.04.52019202020212026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Mary has gone from the 84th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 66.9% of games
3.5
88.5%
23W–3L · 70.5% of games
4.5
40%
8W–12L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 74.6% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.6% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-07-26 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
+0.022better than expected — took 55% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Patterson
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-24 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
+0.005better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
+0.031better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Glenn
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-15 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
0.001about as expected — took 44% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-13 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
0.040below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Williams
+0.000below expectation — took 62% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
+0.011better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.