Search

Nina Hanson

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
167 matches · 110W–57L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
139 of 266
OR · 4.0
260 of 498

Nina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams40 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nina has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Nina has gone from the 7th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 64.1% of games
3.5
70.5%
31W–13L · 57.4% of games
4.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
21W–6L · 60.5% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-07-19 · PTC-White/Reis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Gamboa
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · PTC-White · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Kanz
0.015below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · PTC-White · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Schwarz
+0.006about as expected — took 35% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · PTC-White · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariana White
0.011below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · PTC-White · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fiona Tait
+0.070better than expected — took 68% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · PTC-White · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morgan Cowling
+0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · PTC-White · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Grisham
0.018below expectation — took 40% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-31 · PTC-White · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Kanz
+0.055better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-01-03 · PTC-White · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariana White
+0.059better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-26 · PTC-Tait/Schwarz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Reizes
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-19 · PT&E/SJRC-Reis/White · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Simmering
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-17 · PTC-Tait/Schwarz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Allers
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.