Search

Daniel Reizes

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
47 matches · 24W–23L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
117 of 399
OR · 3.5
227 of 735

Daniel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Daniel has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Daniel has gone from the 96th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 59.9% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-06-13 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Johnson
0.016below expectation — took 52% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kai Meltzer / Hanmin Wang
2026-06-07 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Lurie
0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 5-4
W
2026-05-09 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Johnson
+0.010better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Byrd
+0.030better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.014below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #1 Doubles · with Robert Glenn
+0.026better than expected — took 41% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Robert Wei / Kai Zhangchamps
2026-04-11 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #3 Doubles · with Brad Johnson
+0.032better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-22 · N OR-CRRC-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Johnson
0.026below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Scott Sweet / Stephen Crook
2026-03-14 · N OR-CRRC-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Nguyen
0.048below expectation — took 33% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-21 · PTC-Larsen/Ellsworth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Koch
+0.019about as expected — took 29% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-24 · PTC-Larsen/Ellsworth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Johnson
+0.042better than expected — took 43% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-6
W
2026-01-10 · N OR-CRRC-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Koch
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.