← Search

John van Leeuwen

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 55W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John van Leeuwen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-03-22 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russ DeMoss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-19 · N OR-SHC-Lumetta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pierre Burthey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-13 · N OR-SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pierre Burthey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-09-06 · N OR-SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Pacioni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-06-13 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Metke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-06-07 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ray Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-05-18 · SHC-Trank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kiersten Lake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-18 · SHC-Trank · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris van Leeuwen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-04-12 · SHC-Trank · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris van Leeuwen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-08 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-01-04 · SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Bingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56.8%
21W–16L · 52.9% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.7% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.7%
16W–19L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe