← Search

Ken Pacioni

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 17W–29L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Ken Pacioni to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · with Mike Baker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-09 · SHC-Mayer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-02 · SHC-Mayer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · SHC-Allen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arron Heriford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-03 · SHC-Allen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Griggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Scott Mayer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2025-11-22 · N OR-SHC-Lumetta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-09-06 · N OR-SHC-Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John van Leeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2024-06-14 · SHC-Gettle/Van Leeuwen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Bingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-06-01 · SHC-Gettle/Van Leeuwen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Gettle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-05-26 · SHC-Gettle/Van Leeuwen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-31 · SHC-Gettle/Van Leeuwen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2009–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.6% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
17.6%
3W–14L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer