Search

Pete Kovalenko

Camas, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
52 matches · 24W–28L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.29
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Camas · 3.5
8 of 25
WA · 3.5
576 of 1209

Pete is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams20 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pete has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.3% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
42.4%
14W–19L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-07-03 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ericka Nelson
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Janet Ha / Daniel M Kimmixed
2026-06-28 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Mills
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-24 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Nieda
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyra John
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dayna Porter
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-03-29 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Mills
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-14 · VTC-Savage · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Thorburn
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · VTC-Savage · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Sweet
0.036below expectation — took 62% of games against 71% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-08 · VTC-Savage · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Duncan Sharkey
0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jon Bryant / Peter Kim
2026-01-31 · VTC-Savage · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Brown
+0.021about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Ken Pacioni / Richard Miller
2025-11-22 · VTC-Savage 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Shafer
+0.033better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-10-19 · VTC-Savage 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Brown
+0.037better than expected — took 45% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.