Search

Michael Archer

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
40 matches · 14W–26L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.13. Higher than today’s 3.12 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
335 of 399
OR · 3.5
632 of 735

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
GLVR-Robertson
2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
PTC-Wagner/Tse
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
PTC-Panni/Lasocki
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
LOTC-Semonsen
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2025
GLVR-Robertson
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
GLVR-Robertson
2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 25.8% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
29.2%
7W–17L · 43.7% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-04-25 · GLVR-Robertson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Greenblatt
+0.000below expectation — took 28% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-04-18 · GLVR-Robertson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Zhu
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Misug Kim / Daniel M Kimmixed
2026-04-04 · GLVR-Robertson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Robertson
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-04 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maharshi Chauhan
0.064below expectation — took 20% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Crosson
0.015below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Piero Fenato / Gerard Mildner
2026-02-07 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Simonsen
0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-01 · PTC-Wagner/Tse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Simonsen
0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-09 · PTC-Panni/Lasocki · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brittany Donnelly
+0.000better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Sid Ramachandran / Christine Brownmixed
2025-11-02 · PTC-Panni/Lasocki · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marjorie Saine
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-06 · PTC-Panni/Lasocki · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Lasocki
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-08-03 · GLVR-Robertson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gretchen Newcomb
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
Lorna Goth / Jason Bicemixed
2025-07-26 · GLVR-Robertson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Johnson
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.