← Search

Ann Lasocki

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 22W–36L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ann Lasocki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-08-02 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tri Pham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Rainey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamil Panni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamil Panni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · PTC-Bowie · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · PTC-Bowie · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · PTC-Bowie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parish Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-04 · PTC-Bowie · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-03-28 · PTC-Bowie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parish Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-07 · PTC-Traylen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parish Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-28 · PTC-Traylen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-13 · PTC-Traylen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kari Hastings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 52.1% of games
4.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 31.4% of games
7.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#1 Singles
12%
7 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer