← Search

Lucia Parker

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 54W–36L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Lucia Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-09-13 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-11 · IRV-Lewis/Quisling · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Griffin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Marr/Malama · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Ferre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · IRV-Kuerbis/Norling · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Gamboa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · Marr/Malama · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Marr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · IRV-Kuerbis/Norling · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Gamboa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Sarah Sasek championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-14 · IRV-Morris · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Ferre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · Marr/Malama · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelley Malama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-07 · IRV-Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Marr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · ET-Tanca · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurel Hallock Koppelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-24 · IRV-Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.2%
24W–14L · 55.9% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.6% of games
6.0
100%
11W–0L · 79.2% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe