← Search

Deborah Cohen

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 66W–39L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Deborah Cohen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-09-13 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lucia Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joshua Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Bryan Potter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Bryan Potter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mazyar Afshar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tate Kuerbis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fred Kowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Potter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-22 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Conners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-13 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lucia Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-07 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Conners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
57.1%
24W–18L · 54.1% of games
6.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 55.6% of games
6.0mixed
71.9%
23W–9L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova