Search

Deborah Cohen

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
103 matches · 65W–38L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.88
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
93%
stay 3.0
7%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.83. Lower than today’s 2.88 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
143 of 357
OR · 3.0
243 of 600

Deborah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deborah has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Deborah has gone from the 50th to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
57.1%
24W–18L · 54.1% of games
6.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.5% of games
6.0mixed
74.2%
23W–8L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history103 matches
L
Ke Wang / Xiayi Lichamps
2026-07-11 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #2 Doubles · with Bryan Potter
+0.013better than expected — took 46% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Rebecca Ostergaard / Ephraim Zuckermanchamps
2026-07-10 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #1 Doubles · with Bryan Potter
0.022below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kathleen Cooney / Patrick Cooneymixed
2026-06-21 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mazyar Afshar
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Michael Hindhaugh / Shalini Vivekmixed
2026-06-14 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tate Kuerbis
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fred Kowell
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Potter
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 81% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Laura Berner / Lucila Griesser
2026-03-22 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Conners
0.012about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lucia Parker
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Kitty Bozzini / Robyn Hartmeyer
2026-03-07 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Townsend
0.022below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Erin Doucet / Gail Johnson
2026-02-22 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Conners
+0.033better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-08 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Rothrock
0.023below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Marr
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.