Teams

N OR-IRV-Kuerbis

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Brooke Kuerbis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Teresa Chan
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.21
Erin Rothrock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.13
Bryan Potter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.08
Jared Rollier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
Thomas Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Tate Kuerbis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Brendan Dineen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Luis Ponce de Leon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Kristin Morris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Deborah Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Brian DuVal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Brooke Kuerbis
93W–31L career
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Teresa Chan
60W–20L career
0%99%1%
3.34
3
Erin Rothrock
36W–19L career
0%22%78%
3.21
3
Bryan Potter
69W–39L career
0%43%57%
3.13
3
Jared Rollier
47W–31L career
0%60%40%
3.08
3
Thomas Griffin
41W–33L career
0%69%31%
3.05
3
Tate Kuerbis
55W–40L career
0%85%15%
2.98
3
Brendan Dineen
24W–14L career
0%88%12%
2.96
3
Luis Ponce de Leon
78W–46L career
0%92%8%
2.94
3
Kristin Morris
51W–47L career
0%94%6%
2.91
3
Deborah Cohen
65W–38L career
0%96%4%
2.88
3
Brian DuVal
23W–20L career
3%96%2%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.