Search

Karla Hendrickson

Wilsonville, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
150 matches · 41W–109L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
20%
down to 2.5
80%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 12% down · 88% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.59. Higher than today’s 2.57 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Wilsonville · 3.0
6 of 7
OR · 3.0
580 of 600

Karla is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams49 teams · 2014–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Karla has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Karla has gone from the 9th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
2.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 52.2% of games
3.0
31.8%
14W–30L · 40.9% of games
3.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 35.8% of games
6.0
19%
4W–17L · 40.2% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.1% of games
6.0mixed
32.4%
11W–23L · 40.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–10L · 23.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-07-18 · CHARB-Wall/Siri · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Snyder
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Mark Lee / Christin Harringtonmixed
2026-07-12 · CHARB-Wall/Siri · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Snyder
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · CHARB-Wall/Taylor · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catalin Stoica
+0.000about as expected — took 20% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · SHC-Hartson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Walker
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 19% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · SHC-Hartson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chuck Gray
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-04 · CHARB-Wall/Taylor · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Mills
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Emily Becker / Maria Rivero-Gore
2026-02-22 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Jenkins
0.006about as expected — took 46% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Hayes
+0.007about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Delia Mcqueen / Debbie Fitzpatrick
2026-01-31 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicola Ash
0.008about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Lina Gao / Yan Li
2026-01-11 · CHARB-Siri/Enos · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Row
+0.017better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-01-03 · CHARB-Siri/Enos · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Salisbury
+0.033about as expected — took 29% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-05 · CHARB-Taylor/Bell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Snyder
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.