← Search

Nicola Ash

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
254 matches · 117W–137L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nicola Ash to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history254 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Matt Savage championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · NOR-CRRC-Ash · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phillip Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-07 · NOR-CRRC-Ash · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Savage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · NOR-CRRC-Ash · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Savage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-24 · VTC-Barrett · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anamaria Musterer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-10 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nick Hooker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-03 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nick Hooker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roxanna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · VTC-Barrett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivy Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-19 · VTC-Barrett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivy Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-18 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nick Hooker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-28 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
50%
10W–10L · 47.4% of games
3.0
32.2%
28W–59L · 43.5% of games
3.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 29.9% of games
6.0
50%
8W–8L · 50.6% of games
6.0mixed
75%
42W–14L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
103 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
62 matches
#1 Singles
6%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer