← Search

Roxanna Johnson

West Linn, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 117W–67L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Roxanna Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-09-13 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chase Stowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexander Abrazaldo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
Aera Seo / John Kim
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Abhisar Gupta championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · VTC-Watkins/Savage · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · Love Means Nothing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sophia Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-29 · Love Means Nothing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · NOR-CRRC-Ash · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phillip Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · VTC-Watkins/Savage · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · VTC-Watkins/Savage · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Russell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · NOR-CRRC-Ash · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · NOR-CRRC-Ash · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · Love Means Nothing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sophia Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
58.8%
40W–28L · 52.7% of games
3.0
61.9%
26W–16L · 55.9% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.2% of games
6.0mixed
75%
24W–8L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer