Search

Chase Stowell

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
49 matches · 32W–17L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.01
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
46%
stay 3.0
54%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 83% stay · 17% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.01 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
77 of 357
OR · 3.0
125 of 600

Chase is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chase has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 65.5% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.6% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.8% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
Todd Shupp / Kenny Ristau
2026-07-07 · Choo Choo · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andre Golovchenko
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · Choo Choo · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andre Golovchenko
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Yun Chong / Hao Lee
2026-06-06 · CRRC-Golovchenko/Stowell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Callan Stowell
0.010about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
James Clarke
2026-02-14 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Golvochenko · #1 Male Singles · 6.0
0.034below expectation — took 40% of games against 56% expected
6-4
W
Hanmin Wang / Zi Wang
2026-02-08 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Golvochenko · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexander Abrazaldo
+0.015better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4
L
Fernando Ritzinger
2026-02-07 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Higgins · #1 Male Singles · 7.0
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2
W
2026-01-25 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Higgins · #1 Male Doubles · 7.0 · with Andre Golovchenko
0.001better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-2
W
Shujian Li / Ty Gong
2026-01-18 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Golvochenko · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Andre Golovchenko
+0.011better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-2
W
Miguel Soler / Daniel Paul
2026-01-11 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Higgins · #1 Male Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Kim
+0.077better than expected — took 67% of games against 35% expected
6-3
W
Matthew Claudel / Alicia Villarino
2026-01-04 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Higgins · #1 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Clare Belott
+0.037better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-1
W
2025-12-06 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Mandel
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clare Belott
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.