Search

Vanessa Weber

Ridgefield, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
90 matches · 55W–35L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
2%
stay 3.0
98%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 32% stay · 68% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.04. Lower than today’s 3.16 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Ridgefield · 3.0
1 of 5
WA · 3.0
48 of 755

Vanessa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Vanessa has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Vanessa has gone from the 99th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 66.5% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.8% of games
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 64% of games
7.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 57.3% of games
6.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 69.7% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
L
Maribel Bautista Tena / Lauren Kinderknecht
2026-07-20 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
+0.006about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with THAO VAN
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Snieder
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Katie Morrison / Kheoshi Owens
2026-05-23 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Henry
0.017about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailee Higgins
0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Pultz
0.028below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Nichole Dewson / Katja Daoud
2026-05-09 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
0.020about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Henry
0.019about as expected — took 80% of games against 76% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailee Higgins
+0.071better than expected — took 80% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
0.005about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Chili He / Rachele Martellochamps
2026-03-15 · #1 Female Doubles · with Samantha Damiano
0.065below expectation — took 40% of games against 65% expected
6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.