Search

Erin Mader

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
77 matches · 43W–34L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
76%
stay 3.0
24%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.94 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
113 of 357
OR · 3.0
183 of 600

Erin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erin has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Erin has gone from the 69th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.5% of games
3.0
50%
23W–23L · 51.2% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 71.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
L
Maribel Bautista Tena / Lauren Kinderknecht
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Weber
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Weber
+0.006about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Priscilla Paik
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.028better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Nichole Dewson / Katja Daoud
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Weber
0.020about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Kristin DeVoto / Cecily Schmidt
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Glenn
0.037below expectation — took 57% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Joanna Asia Wagner
2026-05-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.073below expectation — took 20% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.051better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amory-Katelyn Zschach
+0.036better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.024better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Sarah Carnaroli
2026-03-16 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Ann Jensen
2026-03-12 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.007about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.013about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.