← Search

Erin Mader

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 48W–35L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Erin Mader to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-08-09 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amory-Katelyn Zschach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · Erin M. · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-25 · Erin M. · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amory-Katelyn Zschach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-24 · Erin M. · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.5% of games
3.0
51%
25W–24L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 62.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
12%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer