← Search

Anita Heredia

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 64W–40L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Anita Heredia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Heredia · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-2
W
2026-09-07 · Heredia · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-2
W
2026-08-17 · Heredia · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-5
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Khaden Jee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-09 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Harkin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Venezia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · Heredia · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Grey Proctor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Venezia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adriana McCord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Heredia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 64.8% of games
3.0
58.6%
34W–24L · 56.9% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.7% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
18W–3L · 67.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams