← Search

Julie Row

Wilsonville, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
56 matches · 18W–38L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
96%
stay 3.0
4%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.81. Lower than today’s 2.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Wilsonville · 3.0
3 of 7
OR · 3.0
282 of 600

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has played at 2.5, 3.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.03.520202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Julie has gone from the 1st to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 80% of games
3.0
35%
7W–13L · 44.7% of games
3.5
18.5%
5W–22L · 38.7% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
L
Ying Deng
2026-07-26 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.011about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Angela Rampone
2026-07-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.071below expectation — took 29% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Quon
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Quon
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Bunch
+0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Taylor
−0.010about as expected — took 45% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Burns / Kathryn Paul
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cricket Forsey
+0.031better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Wiencek
+0.024better than expected — took 41% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cricket Forsey
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Adilene Isordia
2026-04-12 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 17% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlene Enos
−0.009below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Lina Gao / Yan Li
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karla Hendrickson
+0.017better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.