← Search

Elizabeth Burns

Portland, OR
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
137 matches · 73W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Burns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-05-22 · MAC-Leedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-02 · MAC-Leedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Leta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-15 · MAC-Hopson/Cooney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheryl Wehner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-30 · MAC-Hopson/Cooney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Risch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-22 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Koerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-25 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Cooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-10 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-13 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-14 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Krupicka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-05-11 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-04-27 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacquelyn Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Julie Cyran / CW Evans
2025-03-15 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Chenoweth championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 59.2% of games
3.5
39.5%
17W–26L · 45.8% of games
6.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 70.4% of games
7.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 45.3% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal