Search

Vivian Krupicka

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
20 matches · 11W–9L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
21%
stay 3.0
79%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 66% stay · 34% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Lower than today’s 3.07 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
55 of 357
OR · 3.0
90 of 600

Vivian is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
MAC-Nearn
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
MAC-Nearn/Morris
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
MAC-Cooney/Hopson
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman
2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
MAC-Bounds/Popma
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Vivian has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 3 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 57% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 39.8% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history20 matches
W
Dorothy Shin / Jihyun Kang
2026-05-29 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Cronn
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Deanna Williams / Stephanie Titler
2026-05-08 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Chelsea Smith / Lindsey Yeung
2026-05-02 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Virginia Welch / Ali Walker
2026-04-19 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
0.022below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-6
W
Mindy Chin / Van Chinh Bui
2026-03-21 · MAC-Nearn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
+0.008better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Marianne McIntosh / Carrie Thomas
2026-03-14 · MAC-Nearn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
0.066below expectation — took 35% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-08 · MAC-Nearn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
0.017below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Lynda Borja / Nancy Lowenberg
2026-01-11 · MAC-Nearn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
+0.059better than expected — took 100% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-08-09 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Landrey
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Andrea Kropp / John Nguyenmixed
2025-07-20 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fergus Caldicott
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
N/Amixed
2025-07-19 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Landrey
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-28 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jesse Inkpen
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.